Bitcoin near $95K despite tariff woes, analyst concern

• Bitcoin traded above $95,400 Tuesday, showing resilience despite economic concerns.
• US stocks (S&P 500, Nasdaq +0.55%) also continued their recovery from early April tariff fears.
• Consumer confidence hit lowest since May 2020; JOLTS job openings missed estimates.

Cryptocurrency markets displayed notable stability on Tuesday, seemingly unfazed by mounting pessimism regarding the economic impact of the Trump administration’s tariff policies.

Bitcoin edged higher, reclaiming ground above $95,000, while traditional stock markets also continued a recovery trend, prompting some analysts to question whether markets are accurately pricing in underlying economic risks.

Markets march higher despite warning signs

Bitcoin (BTC) continued its recent positive momentum, gaining about 1% over the preceding 24 hours to trade near $95,400.

This move brought the key $96,000 level – last seen in late February – within striking distance.

The broader crypto market showed similar resilience, with the CoinDesk 20 index advancing 1.1%.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) stood out with a significant 6.3% surge.

Crypto-related equities also participated, albeit modestly, with Coinbase (COIN) up 0.9% and MicroStrategy (MSTR) adding 3.3%, while Janover (JNVR) continued its strong run (+16%) linked to its Solana accumulation strategy.

This relative calm in digital assets mirrored strength in traditional equities.

Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq composite posted gains of 0.55%, extending the recovery from the tariff-induced panic seen earlier in April.

Economic data paints sobering picture

However, this market buoyancy unfolded against a backdrop of increasingly concerning economic indicators, suggesting a potential slowdown possibly linked to the White House’s tariff strategies.

The Conference Board reported that US consumer confidence plummeted to its lowest level since May 2020, with the forward-looking consumer outlook component hitting its weakest point since 2011.

Simultaneously, the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) indicated a cooling labor market, with job openings falling to 7.19 million in March, significantly below the expected 7.5 million.

Adding to the complex policy environment, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick mentioned Tuesday that a trade deal had been reached with an unspecified country, though he noted it still required ratification, offering little immediate clarity on the broader tariff situation.

Analyst warns of market ‘blindness’ to fundamental risks

This apparent disconnect between market performance and weakening economic data has raised red flags among some observers.

Jeff Park, head of Alpha Strategies at digital asset investment firm Bitwise, expressed strong concern about the market’s perspective.

“Hard to fathom how blind the market really is,” Park posted on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

He argued that the market’s intense focus on potential Federal Reserve interest rate cuts misses a larger, more fundamental risk.

“A Fed cut means nothing if US creditworthiness is permanently impaired by the global community as resulted by dollar weaponization,” Park elaborated, linking the potential damage to Trump administration policies that leverage the dollar’s global role.

He suggested that speculation about whether the Fed might be forced to cut rates to offset tariff impacts is misplaced.

“That’s the mispricing we are talking about here,” he continued.

The myopic focus on whether [we] are getting a fed cut in May/June is completely irrelevant if the notion of the risk-free as we know it is fundamentally challenged forever, which means cost of capital globally is going higher.

Park’s comments highlight a deeper concern: that markets might be rallying on short-term hopes (like potential rate cuts) while ignoring potentially severe, longer-term structural damage to the US financial standing and the global cost of capital caused by ongoing policy uncertainty and aggressive trade tactics.

While Bitcoin holds firm near recent highs, the debate continues over whether current market strength reflects genuine resilience or a dangerous disregard for underlying economic headwinds.