$7 Trillion Financial Giant Fidelity Urges Senate to Pass CLARITY Act

Fidelity Brings Wall Street Heft to Crypto Campaign

Fidelity Public Policy, the government affairs and public policy arm of Fidelity Investments, posted on X on July 24 calling for Senate passage of the CLARITY Act.

The organization framed comprehensive federal rules as necessary for investor confidence, commercial certainty, and continued U.S. leadership in the increasingly competitive global digital asset economy.

That intervention carries unusual financial weight, as Fidelity Investments reported $37.7 billion in 2025 revenue, $18 trillion in assets under administration, and $7.1 trillion in managed assets. Its official 2025 annual report also documents an investment platform serving millions of workplace, brokerage, wealth management, and institutional customers across the financial system.

Fidelity already operates cryptocurrency businesses for retail and institutional clients, making its legislative position more consequential than another endorsement from a digital asset advocacy organization.

Crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto reinforced the message on X, contending that businesses and individual investors need predictable standards before committing more money to U.S. cryptocurrency markets. “Institutions want CLARITY. Investors want CLARITY. It is time to pass the CLARITY Act,” the group wrote. The Coinbase-backed organization has generated 950,000 contacts supporting Senate action, demonstrating the scale of pressure now confronting lawmakers.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) CEO David Solomon added another powerful institutional voice through his support for the CLARITY Act, broadening the effort beyond crypto-native companies.

What the CLARITY Act Would Change

Rather than revisiting earlier House approval or committee action, Senate negotiations are now focused on unresolved provisions involving ethics restrictions, stablecoin rewards, and the division of oversight between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

According to the Senate Banking Committee’s CLARITY Act overview, the proposal would establish tailored disclosure requirements, preserve anti-fraud authority, define when the SEC or CFTC regulates a digital asset, and create standards for centralized intermediaries while protecting certain software developers and peer-to-peer activity.

Those provisions could influence exchange listings, issuer disclosures, custody requirements, and enforcement actions involving fraud or manipulation across rapidly evolving digital asset markets.

Senate Divisions Keep the Outcome Uncertain

Despite growing institutional support, senators remain divided over stablecoin rewards, financial crime controls, ethics restrictions, and the boundaries separating securities regulation from commodities oversight.

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the Senate Banking Committee’s ranking Democrat, has challenged the revised proposal over investor protection, national security, and financial stability concerns. Warren’s July 22 examination of the bill identifies alleged enforcement gaps and questions safeguards covering cryptocurrency interests held by senior elected officials.

Senate leaders therefore face a difficult vote-counting exercise as Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Coinbase, and advocacy organizations seek action before the chamber’s limited legislative window closes.

CLARITY Act Delivers 3 Key Benefits for Developers, Investors, and Markets, Senator Says

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis highlighted three key benefits of the CLARITY Act, arguing that the legislation would form part of…

Read Now

CLARITY Act Delivers 3 Key Benefits for Developers, Investors, and Markets, Senator Says

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis highlighted three key benefits of the CLARITY Act, arguing that the legislation would form part of…

Read Now

CLARITY Act Delivers 3 Key Benefits for Developers, Investors, and Markets, Senator Says

Read Now

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis highlighted three key benefits of the CLARITY Act, arguing that the legislation would form part of…