Day 16 Highlights in Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial

During day 16 of the Sam Bankman-Fried trial, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of a New York district court has turned down a request for acquittal by Bankman-Fried’s defense team. With the conclusion of testimonies, the stage is now set for closing arguments on November 1.

The court saw intense scrutiny of Bankman-Fried’s actions and statements following the downfall of FTX. Prosecutors presented evidence showing the former crypto mogul’s attempts to distance himself from Alameda Research, counteracting his public claim of Alameda being distinct from the FTX crypto exchange. Diverging from Bankman-Fried’s public narratives, private conversations submitted as evidence pointed to inconsistencies and direct contradictions regarding the relationship between Alameda and FTX.

Among the crucial testimonies, Bankman-Fried addressed various issues, including his involvement in decisions around a $35 million apartment purchase. He denied knowledge of a coding error that reportedly allowed Alameda to access FTX customer funds. However, he accepted that he had placed trust in his team to resolve these issues while he focused on lobbying in Washington, D.C.

In the courtroom, evidence such as emails and chat logs revealed decisions made under Bankman-Fried’s leadership. This included strategies to manage a liquidity crisis by possibly selling shares in companies like Robinhood and Modulo Capital or securing loans against their equity. One significant revelation was Bankman-Fried’s admission that even a near $4 billion injection might not cover the shortfall in FTX customer accounts.

Furthermore, Bankman-Fried’s interactions with important figures like the Bahamian Prime Minister and decisions allowing Bahamian customers to withdraw funds when FTX faced insolvency came under examination. He was also queried about Alameda’s handling of an $8 billion amount in FTX customer fiat via North Dimension’s account at Silvergate Bank and investments in entities such as K5 Global and Anthropic.

A notable admission from Bankman-Fried involved a controversial comment made to Vox journalist Kelsey Piper, which he attributed to skepticism rather than deceit. He also disclosed that LedgerX CEO Zach Dexter was influential in developing his Congressional testimonies and acknowledged a lack of transparency regarding Alameda’s liabilities to FTX administrators.

In agreement with prior testimony from former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried noted that Alameda’s $600 million investment in Robinhood shares, planned to be transferred to FTX’s bankrupt estate, had spurred a legal battle in Antigua. Despite confirming agreement with some of Ellison’s statements, he denied having full oversight of Alameda’s balance sheets.

As the trial moves towards its concluding phase, the cross-examinations and evidence presented highlight the complex web of financial and managerial decisions within Bankman-Fried’s cryptocurrency empire. The verdict, expected by November 3, remains keenly awaited.