{"id":14478,"date":"2022-11-14T03:45:08","date_gmt":"2022-11-14T03:45:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/conflicting-reports-emerge-about-sec-helping-bankrupt-crypto-exchange-ftx-with-legal-loopholes-regulation-bitcoin-news\/"},"modified":"2022-11-14T03:45:08","modified_gmt":"2022-11-14T03:45:08","slug":"conflicting-reports-emerge-about-sec-helping-bankrupt-crypto-exchange-ftx-with-legal-loopholes-regulation-bitcoin-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/conflicting-reports-emerge-about-sec-helping-bankrupt-crypto-exchange-ftx-with-legal-loopholes-regulation-bitcoin-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Conflicting Reports Emerge About SEC Helping Bankrupt Crypto Exchange FTX With Legal Loopholes \u2013 Regulation Bitcoin News"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News )<\/b>
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/header>\n
\n<\/div>\n

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reportedly met with crypto exchange FTX and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried several times before the crypto firm filed for bankruptcy. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler was rumored to be helping FTX with legal loopholes. However, a new report indicates a contradicting viewpoint.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gensler\u2019s Meeting With Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX<\/h2>\n

Following the bankruptcy filing of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, rumors have surfaced accusing the chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, of helping former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and his bankrupt exchange with \u201clegal loopholes<\/a> to obtain regulatory monopoly.\u201d Some people have even speculated that the SEC boss was about to issue FTX a no-action letter<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Gensler\u2019s own calendar shows that he did meet with Bankman-Fried in March. According to an SEC meeting note, \u201cmembers of the staff of Chair Gensler met with staff of IEX and FTX to discuss<\/a> custody of digital asset securities by special purpose broker-dealers, including the unique risks associated with custody of digital asset securities and the conditional no-action relief discussed in the statement.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, Fox Business\u2019 Charles Gasparino explained<\/a> on Twitter Saturday that \u201cContrary to speculation\u201d about Gensler looking to grant former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried a regulatory monopoly on a crypto exchange:<\/p>\n

\n

March meeting between the two sides was described by a person attending as \u201945 minute lecture by Gensler\u2019 on what he wants from a crypto exchange.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Not only did the SEC chairman make no promises to Bankman-Fried, FTX, and IEX, but he also \u201cordered them to provide much more in the way of disclosure etc to the SEC about their model,\u201d the journalist noted.<\/p>\n

\u201cFollow-up meetings with the SEC continued up to nearly the time FTX imploded but no SEC approval was signaled,\u201d he continued. \u201cHouse GOP likely to hold hearings on FTX given Bankman-Fried\u2019s Dem political leanings by calling Gensler as a witness might have to think twice. Sources say Gensler told Brad Katsuyama & Bankman-Fried he wanted strict oversight, standards & there was no guarantee of approval.\u201d<\/p>\n

Nonetheless, many people have expressed on social media their belief that either Gensler or other SEC staff members were helping FTX. Some suspected that it was because Bankman-Fried is a big donor to the Democratic Party. The former FTX chief was the second largest donor to the Democrats in 2021-22, donating $39.8 million \u2014 second only to George Soros, according to Open Secrets political donor data.<\/p>\n

Referring to the sanctioning<\/a> of Ethereum crypto mixing service Tornado Cash, privacy activist and whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted:<\/p>\n

\n

The White House sanctions and arrests kids for the \u2018crime\u2019 of building privacy tools to protect you, while \u2018regulators\u2019 were quietly palling around with the thieves who just robbed 5 million people. The difference? The thieves were big political donors.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Congressman Tom Emmer (R-MN) tweeted<\/a> Thursday: \u201cReports to my office allege he was helping SBF and FTX work on legal loopholes to obtain a regulatory monopoly. We\u2019re looking into this.\u201d<\/p>\n

Last week, Gensler confirmed<\/a> during an interview on CNBC that he did meet with Bankman-Fried. The SEC chairman said: \u201cI think we\u2019ve been clear in these meetings \u2026 non-compliance is not going to work, the public is going to be hurt.\u201d<\/p>\n

The SEC chairman has often been criticized for his enforcement-centric approach to regulating the crypto industry. Gensler has repeatedly said that crypto trading and lending platforms should \u201ccome in,\u201d talk to the SEC, and get registered. However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said<\/a> in September last year that instead of working with the crypto industry, \u201cthe SEC is using their meetings with companies as lead generation for their enforcement actions.\u201d His company is currently engaged in an ongoing lawsuit with the SEC over the sale of XRP<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In addition, several news outlets have reported that the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have been investigating<\/a> FTX for alleged mishandling of customer funds. In May, Gensler warned that crypto exchanges often trade against<\/a> their customers.<\/p>\n

Do you think the SEC and Chair Gensler were working with crypto exchange FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried on legal loopholes? Let us know in the comments section below.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n
\nKevin Helms <\/h6>\n

\nA student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.

\n
\n
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Image Credits<\/b>: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Disclaimer<\/strong>: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com<\/a> does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n