{"id":16045,"date":"2023-01-02T15:57:02","date_gmt":"2023-01-02T15:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/report-shows-financial-troubles-plagued-bankman-frieds-alameda-research-as-early-as-2018-bitcoin-news\/"},"modified":"2023-01-02T15:57:02","modified_gmt":"2023-01-02T15:57:02","slug":"report-shows-financial-troubles-plagued-bankman-frieds-alameda-research-as-early-as-2018-bitcoin-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/report-shows-financial-troubles-plagued-bankman-frieds-alameda-research-as-early-as-2018-bitcoin-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Report Shows Financial Troubles Plagued Bankman-Fried\u2019s Alameda Research as Early as 2018 \u2013 Bitcoin News"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News )<\/b>
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/header>\n
\n<\/div>\n

Before FTX collapsed it was assumed that Alameda Research was one of the top quantitative trading firms and market makers within the industry. However, much of that perception may have been a facade as a recent report details that Alameda suffered from financial troubles as early as 2018. People familiar with the matter said Alameda was losing money back then and a massive loss from a failed xrp trade in mid-2018 cut the company\u2019s assets by more than two-thirds.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Alameda Research\u2019s Fa\u00e7ade as a Top Quantitative Crypto Trading Firm Crumbles with Reveal of Early Financial Struggles<\/h2>\n

Sam Bankman-Fried<\/a>\u2019s (SBF) Alameda Research reportedly lost large sums of money as early as 2018, according to a report published by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Alameda Research was a quantitive trading firm that was officially launched in Sept. 2017 with Tara Mac Aulay. Prior to launching Alameda, SBF worked for Jane Street and he traded international exchange-traded funds (ETFs) until he started his position as the director of development at the Centre for Effective Altruism.<\/p>\n

\"Report
Sam Bankman-Fried.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Reports<\/a> detail that when SBF started Alameda, the trading firm was making millions by via arbitrage. As an arbitrageur, SBF claimed that opportunities stemmed from countries like Japan and South Korea as bitcoin (BTC<\/a>) was trading for a premium in those regions. Because of the so-called \u201cKimchi premium\u201d in South Korea, SBF said BTC<\/a> was 30% higher at times and in Japan, it was 10% higher. There\u2019s a slew of reports that highlight Alameda making millions from crypto arbitrage, but a recent report from the Wall Street Journal published on Dec. 31, 2022, details Alameda\u2019s trades were not always profitable.<\/p>\n

The report says that while SBF stepped down as chief executive from Alameda, he was still very much in control of the company until the very end. The WSJ reporter Vicky Ge Huang detailed that Alameda \u201ctook big gambles, winning some and losing plenty.\u201d Further, the WSJ report says SBF continuously borrowed money to bolster such bets and he promised investors double-digit returns if they helped him. According to Austin Campbell, Citigroup\u2019s former co-head of digital assets rates trading, the firm was looking to partner with market makers like Alameda, but Campbell said he grew skeptical of SBF\u2019s firm.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe thing that I picked up on immediately that was causing us heartburn was the complete lack of a risk-management framework that they could articulate in any meaningful way,\u201d Campbell detailed.<\/p>\n

SBF\u2019s Solicitation of Lenders Raised Questions About Company\u2019s Financial Stability<\/h2>\n

According to people familiar with the matter and Alameda\u2019s trading, the arbitrage opportunities quickly stopped and Alameda\u2019s trading algorithm allegedly made a lot of bad bets. In the spring of 2018, Alameda took a huge hit betting on xrp (XRP<\/a>) losing over two-thirds of Alameda\u2019s assets. So SBF reportedly started to solicit loans again with pitches promising 20% returns, the people familiar with the matter explained. A document reviewed by the WSJ shows SBF\u2019s lawyer explained how Alameda was a top market maker in one specific pitch to a lender, but the lawyer did not reveal any financial information.<\/p>\n

Other people familiar with the matter said SBF sought lenders in Jan. 2019 at a Binance Blockchain Week event in Singapore. While Alameda sponsored the event with $150K, the conference was allegedly used by SBF to solicit lenders and a pamphlet was handed out to potential investors. The pamphlet claimed Alameda held $55 million in assets under management (AUM) but whether or not that data was factual remains to be seen. By Feb. 2019, SBF decided to move Alameda from California to Hong Kong. Former associates said that during the crypto bull run in 2021, Alameda made roughly $1 billion in profits, but when the bull run ended, SBF\u2019s bets began to sour.<\/p>\n

Reports<\/a> also show that Alameda\u2019s former CEO Caroline Ellison had a significant negative balance on FTX in May 2022, months before the FTX fallout. Complaints<\/a> from the indictment in Manhattan, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charges<\/a>, and the lawsuit filed<\/a> by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), indicate that Alameda\u2019s losses were so large, it pushed SBF to allegedly borrow funds from FTX customers to bolster the company after the losses. The WSJ further notes that SBF contemplated shutting Alameda down months before the two companies collapsed but the idea never came to fruition.<\/p>\n

\n
\nTags in this story
\n<\/h6>\n
2018<\/a>, Alameda Research<\/a>, Alameda’s losses<\/a>, Arbitrage<\/a>, assets under management<\/a>, Binance Blockchain Week<\/a>, Bitcoin<\/a>, borrowing funds<\/a>, Caroline Ellison<\/a>, ceo<\/a>, CitiGroup<\/a>, crypto arbitrage<\/a>, crypto bull run<\/a>, Financial Troubles<\/a>, ftx<\/a>, FTX fallout<\/a>, Hong Kong<\/a>, indictment<\/a>, investor pitches<\/a>, Jane Street<\/a>, Japan<\/a>, kimchi premium<\/a>, loans<\/a>, Manhattan<\/a>, Market Makers<\/a>, profits<\/a>, quantitative trading<\/a>, quantitative trading firm<\/a>, report<\/a>, risk-management framework<\/a>, Singapore<\/a>, South Korea<\/a>, Tara Mac Aulay<\/a>, Trading Algorithm<\/a>, Wall Street Journal<\/a>, XRP<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What do you think about the report that says Alameda Research was suffering from bad bets as early as 2018? Let us know your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n
\nJamie Redman <\/h6>\n

\nJamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

\n
\n
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Image Credits<\/b>: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Disclaimer<\/strong>: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com<\/a> does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n