{"id":18684,"date":"2023-03-13T23:13:21","date_gmt":"2023-03-13T23:13:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/bank-board-member-and-dodd-frank-co-sponsor-barney-frank-suspects-anti-crypto-message-behind-signature-bank-failure-bitcoin-news\/"},"modified":"2023-03-13T23:13:21","modified_gmt":"2023-03-13T23:13:21","slug":"bank-board-member-and-dodd-frank-co-sponsor-barney-frank-suspects-anti-crypto-message-behind-signature-bank-failure-bitcoin-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/bank-board-member-and-dodd-frank-co-sponsor-barney-frank-suspects-anti-crypto-message-behind-signature-bank-failure-bitcoin-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Bank Board Member and Dodd-Frank Co-Sponsor Barney Frank Suspects ‘Anti-Crypto’ Message Behind Signature Bank Failure \u2013 Bitcoin News"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News )<\/b>
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/header>\n
\n\n<\/div>\n

Barney Frank, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Massachusetts and leading co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, discussed his opinion on the recent failure of Signature Bank. In an interview, Frank stated that he believes regulators aimed to \u201csend a very strong anti-crypto message.\u201d Frank, who also serves as a Signature board member, explained that he was surprised by the financial institution\u2019s demise.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Third-Largest Bank Failure in U.S. History: Signature Bank\u2019s Demise was Confusing to Company Executives<\/h2>\n

New York regulators from the Department of Financial Services (DFS) announced<\/a> on Sunday evening that Signature Bank (SBNY) was shut down and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) took over<\/a> as the bank\u2019s receiver. The seizure was intended to \u201cprotect depositors,\u201d said DFS superintendent Adrienne Harris. Unlike Silvergate Bank<\/a> and Silicon Valley Bank<\/a> (SVB), Signature\u2019s failure was somewhat confusing to some market observers and it was the third-largest bank failure in the United States.<\/p>\n

On Sunday evening, superintendent Harris stated that as of December 31, 2022, Signature had about $110.36 billion in assets and total deposits of around $88.59 billion. According to Barney Frank, a Signature board member and former U.S. representative from Massachusetts, the bank\u2019s failure was surprising to its executives. In a phone call interview<\/a> with CNBC, Frank stated, \u201cWe had no indication of problems until we experienced a deposit run late Friday, which was solely due to contagion from SVB.\u201d<\/p>\n

Frank explained that concern began to spread last week as Signature\u2019s customers began transferring deposits from the New York bank to larger financial institutions such as JPMorgan<\/a> and Citigroup<\/a>. Although the former politician saw \u201cno real objective reason\u201d for Signature to be seized and shut down, he suspected that U.S. regulators may have been sending a message.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think part of what happened was that regulators wanted to send a very strong anti-crypto message,\u201d Frank stated. \u201cWe became the poster boy because there was no insolvency based on the fundamentals.\u201d<\/p>\n

Frank also mentioned that withdrawals slowed on Sunday, and Signature executives believed the situation was resolved. Additionally, he asserted that the bank\u2019s senior staff attempted to explore \u201call avenues\u201d to resolve the financial institution\u2019s liquidity issues. Frank was a co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which made significant changes to how U.S. banking and the financial regulatory system are currently conducted. However, the policy framework has been partially repealed, and some U.S. banks are exempt from the Dodd-Frank ruleset.<\/p>\n

\n
\nTags in this story
\n<\/h6>\n
anti-crypto<\/a>, Bank Failure<\/a>, banking reform<\/a>, banking regulations<\/a>, Barney Frank<\/a>, board member<\/a>, CitiGroup<\/a>, cnbc<\/a>, contagion<\/a>, Department of Financial Services<\/a>, deposit run<\/a>, depositors<\/a>, DFS<\/a>, Dodd-Frank Act<\/a>, FDIC<\/a>, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation<\/a>, Financial Crisis<\/a>, financial industry<\/a>, Financial Institutions<\/a>, Financial News<\/a>, financial regulatory system<\/a>, financial stability<\/a>, Insolvency<\/a>, jpmorgan<\/a>, liquidity problems<\/a>, market observers<\/a>, Massachusetts<\/a>, New York regulators<\/a>, policy framework<\/a>, Regulatory Compliance<\/a>, senior staff<\/a>, Signature Bank<\/a>, Silicon Valley Bank<\/a>, Silvergate Bank<\/a>, U.S. banking<\/a>, U.S. House of Representatives<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What do you think about Barney Frank\u2019s suspicion that regulators wanted to send an anti-crypto message by shutting down Signature Bank? Do you believe this is a fair assessment or is there more to the story? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n\n<\/div>\n
\n
\nJamie Redman <\/h6>\n

\nJamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

\n
\n
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Image Credits<\/b>: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Disclaimer<\/strong>: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com<\/a> does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n