{"id":19366,"date":"2023-03-31T22:40:11","date_gmt":"2023-03-31T22:40:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/tech-industry-leaders-call-for-ai-labs-to-pause-development-for-safety-coinbase-ceo-disagrees-bitcoin-news\/"},"modified":"2023-03-31T22:40:11","modified_gmt":"2023-03-31T22:40:11","slug":"tech-industry-leaders-call-for-ai-labs-to-pause-development-for-safety-coinbase-ceo-disagrees-bitcoin-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/tech-industry-leaders-call-for-ai-labs-to-pause-development-for-safety-coinbase-ceo-disagrees-bitcoin-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Tech Industry Leaders Call for AI Labs to Pause Development for Safety, Coinbase CEO Disagrees \u2013 Bitcoin News"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News )<\/b>
\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n<\/header>\n
\n\n<\/div>\n

This week, 2,600 tech industry moguls and entrepreneurs, including Elon Musk, Gary Marcus, and Steve Wozniak, signed an open letter requesting artificial intelligence (AI) labs to pause research and development for six months. The signatories believe that safety programs and regulations need to be strengthened, as they assert that AI labs are currently in an \u201cout-of-control race to develop and deploy\u201d this technology. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong disagreed with this approach, stating that people should not \u201clet fear stop progress.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Debate on AI Safety: Tech Industry Leaders Call for a Pause in Development, Many Oppose the Idea<\/h2>\n

An open letter signed<\/a> by 2,600 leaders and researchers in the tech industry recommends that AI labs pause their work for six months, and if they refuse, governments should impose a moratorium on development. The group believes that AI is \u201cnow becoming human-competitive at general tasks,\u201d and asserts that powerful AI systems should be developed \u201conly once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cUnfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one \u2014 not even their creators \u2014 can understand, predict, or reliably control,\u201d the open letter<\/a> states. The signatories who signed the letter include Tesla CEO Elon Musk, politician Andrew Yang, AI author Gary Marcus, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the letter notes that AI developers need to work with policymakers if they are creating powerful AI systems. The letter emphasizes that AI could threaten democracy and cause dramatic economic and political disruptions. However, while the letter has more than 2,000 signatories, not everyone agrees with pausing, and some have called it<\/a> \u201cridiculous.\u201d \u201cAmong all the obvious reasons why this temporary pause seems like a silly idea, I also can\u2019t help feeling like this could be a knee-jerk reaction by the corporate elite after having seen just how easily this technology will make many of their goods and services irrelevant,\u201d one individual wrote<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a bad call. Only forward,\u201d another individual tweeted<\/a>. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong shared his opinion<\/a> on the matter. Armstrong doesn\u2019t think fear should stop progress and said that people should be wary of such plans. \u201cCount me among the people who think this is a bad idea,\u201d Armstrong tweeted. \u201cThere are no \u2018experts\u2019 to adjudicate this issue, and many disparate actors will never agree. Committees and bureaucracy won\u2019t solve anything.\u201d Armstrong added:<\/p>\n

\n

As with many technologies, there are dangers, but we should keep marching forward with progress because the good outweighs the bad. The marketplace of ideas leads to better outcomes than central planning. Don\u2019t ever let fear stop progress, and be wary of anyone trying to capture control in some central authority.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Many others believe that pausing AI development is not a good idea, and some insist that the plan is for AI monopolies that are already leading the race to maintain self-preservation. Regius Professor and CEO of Chemify, Lee Cronin, wrote<\/a>, \u201cThis is nonsensical. It\u2019s like asking to destroy the book that explains how to build the printing press, which itself was printed on the printing press.\u201d The discussion regarding a pause in AI development has become a topical and controversial<\/a> subject this week, and it\u2019s currently unclear whether AI labs will follow through with the suggestion.<\/p>\n

\n
\nTags in this story
\n<\/h6>\n
ai<\/a>, AI development<\/a>, AI labs<\/a>, AI monopolies<\/a>, Andrew Yang<\/a>, Artificial Intelligence<\/a>, Authority<\/a>, central planning<\/a>, Chemify<\/a>, control<\/a>, controversy<\/a>, Creators<\/a>, Democracy<\/a>, Development<\/a>, digital minds<\/a>, discussion<\/a>, economic disruptions<\/a>, Elon Musk<\/a>, entrepreneurs<\/a>, Fear<\/a>, Gary Marcus<\/a>, manageable risks<\/a>, moratorium<\/a>, Open Letter<\/a>, out-of-control race<\/a>, pausing<\/a>, policymakers<\/a>, political disruptions<\/a>, positive effects<\/a>, powerful AI systems<\/a>, printing press<\/a>, progress<\/a>, Regius Professor<\/a>, Regulations<\/a>, Research<\/a>, safety programs<\/a>, self-preservation<\/a>, signatories<\/a>, Steve Wozniak<\/a>, suggestion<\/a>, tech industry<\/a>, technology<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What are your thoughts on the debate over whether AI labs should pause their work for six months or continue with progress, and how do you believe the potential risks of AI development should be managed? Share your perspective in the comments section below.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n\n<\/div>\n
\n
\nJamie Redman <\/h6>\n

\nJamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

\n
\n
\n<\/a>
\n<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Image Credits<\/b>: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Disclaimer<\/strong>: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com<\/a> does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n