{"id":32666,"date":"2024-06-19T06:14:26","date_gmt":"2024-06-19T06:14:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/ripples-10-million-settlement-rejected-by-sec-deemed-insufficient\/"},"modified":"2024-06-19T06:14:26","modified_gmt":"2024-06-19T06:14:26","slug":"ripples-10-million-settlement-rejected-by-sec-deemed-insufficient","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/ripples-10-million-settlement-rejected-by-sec-deemed-insufficient\/","title":{"rendered":"Ripple\u2019s $10 Million Settlement Rejected by SEC, Deemed Insufficient"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>(Originally posted on : Crypto News &#8211; iGaming.org )<\/b><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has pushed back against Ripple\u2019s attempt to lessen its fines. Last week, Ripple highlighted the SEC\u2019s recent <a href=\"https:\/\/igaming.org\/crypto\/terraform-labs-reaches-multi-billion-dollar-settlement-with-sec\/\">$4.47 billion settlement with Terraform Labs<\/a> to argue against the severity of their own penalties.<\/p>\n<p>Ripple, a San Francisco-based payments company, referenced the Terraform Labs settlement to showcase the \u201cunreasonableness\u201d of the SEC\u2019s civil penalty in their case. The SEC had settled with Terraform Labs after it defrauded investors, resulting in a $4.05 billion disgorgement, $420 million civil fine, and $80 million penalty for founder Do Kwon. Ripple\u2019s lawyers pointed out that the $420 million civil penalty represents about 1.27% of Terraform\u2019s $33 billion gross sales. They stated, <em>\u201cIn comparable (and even in more egregious) cases, the SEC has agreed to civil penalties ranging from 0.6% to 1.8% of the defendant\u2019s gross revenues. Terraform fits that pattern. Here, by contrast, the SEC seeks a civil penalty far exceeding that range, even though there are no allegations of fraud in this case and Institutional Buyers did not suffer substantial losses.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>SEC\u2019s Rebuttal<\/h2>\n<p>However, the SEC argued that settlements have \u201climited value\u201d in determining litigation penalties. The SEC emphasized that Ripple\u2019s comparison doesn\u2019t hold water because Ripple hasn\u2019t agreed to any similar concessions. They stated, <em>\u201cIn asking the Court to tether its penalty determination in this case to the settlement in Terraform, Ripple fails to note that the corporate defendant there is in bankruptcy, going \u2018out of business for good,\u2019 burning the keys to all of its crypto asset securities, agreeing to return a significant amount to investors in those securities, and removing two of the board members in charge at the time of the violations. The SEC took all these factors in agreeing to a settlement, and repeatedly cited them as the facts relevant for the court to approve the settlement under applicable law. Ripple is agreeing to none of this relief \u2013 in fact, Ripple is agreeing to nothing.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The SEC sued Ripple in late 2020 for allegedly selling XRP as an unregistered security. Last year, US District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Ripple\u2019s automated, open-market sales of XRP did not constitute security offerings. However, she agreed with the SEC that Ripple\u2019s direct sales of XRP to institutional buyers were indeed securities offerings.<\/p>\n<p>In March, the SEC requested the court to order Ripple to pay $876,308,712 in disgorgement, $198,150,940 in prejudgment interest, and a $876,308,712 civil penalty, totaling around $1.95 billion. Ripple\u2019s lawyers argue that a $10 million penalty would appropriately reflect the percentage of the company\u2019s actual gross revenues from pre-complaint institutional sales.<\/p>\n<div class=\"main-org-3-item-ins box-100 relative mb-4\">\n<div class=\"space-org-3-items box-100 relative\">\n<div class=\"box-100 space-org-3-item relative border-tb mt-1 \">\n<div class=\"space-org-3-item-ins box-100 relative\">\n<div class=\"space-org-3-item-terms box-25 relative\">\n<div class=\"space-org-3-item-terms-ins box-100 text-center relative\"> <strong><strong>250% Extra + $125 Free Chip!<\/strong><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>New players only. 250% on 1st Deposit + $125 Free Chip<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>The SEC countered this, stating, <em>\u201cRipple avoids comparing the Terraform settlement\u2019s penalty to the gross profit of the violative conduct. That ratio ($420 million\/$3.587 billion) is significantly higher: 11.7%. Applying it to the $876.3 million in gross profits the SEC here asks the Court to disgorge results in a much larger figure, a $102.6 million penalty, than the $10 million ceiling Ripple insists on. And, for the reasons previously set forth, that low of a penalty would not satisfy the purposes of the civil penalty statutes.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/igaming.org\/crypto\/ripples-10-million-settlement-rejected-by-sec-deemed-insufficient\/\">Source link <\/a><br \/>\n<br \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Originally posted on : Crypto News &#8211; iGaming.org ) The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has pushed back against Ripple\u2019s attempt to lessen its fines. Last week, Ripple highlighted the SEC\u2019s recent $4.47 billion settlement with Terraform Labs to argue against the severity of their own penalties. Ripple, a San Francisco-based payments company, referenced [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":32667,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32666"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32666\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}