{"id":73173,"date":"2026-05-27T23:03:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T23:03:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/another-set-of-long-silent-bitcoin-wallets-move-millions-during-btc-decline\/"},"modified":"2026-05-27T23:03:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T23:03:44","slug":"another-set-of-long-silent-bitcoin-wallets-move-millions-during-btc-decline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/another-set-of-long-silent-bitcoin-wallets-move-millions-during-btc-decline\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Set of Long-Silent Bitcoin Wallets Move Millions During BTC Decline"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News )<\/b><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"@container mb-[25px] rounded-sm overflow-clip py-0.5 pr-0.5 pl-2.5 bg-success-100\">\n<div class=\"flex flex-col gap-m overflow-clip rounded-[6px] !bg-success-10 p-3 @[420px]:p-m\">\n<h2 class=\"m-0 flex items-center gap-s text-[19px] !text-[#1c1c1c] md:text-[20px]\"><svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"16\" height=\"10\" viewbox=\"0 0 16 10\" fill=\"none\" class=\"shrink-0 text-success-100\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><path d=\"M1 1.5h14\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"2.5\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\/><path d=\"M1 8.5h10\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"2.5\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\/><\/svg><span>Key Takeaways<\/span><\/h2>\n<ul class=\"m-0 flex list-none flex-col gap-m pl-0\">\n<li class=\"m-0 flex items-start gap-s !text-[#434248]\"><span class=\"mt-2 size-2 shrink-0 rounded-full bg-success-100\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/><span class=\"text-body\">Bitcoin wallets from 2014 and 2017 moved 150.81 BTC across multiple transfers on May 26.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"m-0 flex items-start gap-s !text-[#434248]\"><span class=\"mt-2 size-2 shrink-0 rounded-full bg-success-100\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/><span class=\"text-body\">Coinbase received 53.96 BTC from a 2014 wallet, raising potential sale speculation.<\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"m-0 flex items-start gap-s !text-[#434248]\"><span class=\"mt-2 size-2 shrink-0 rounded-full bg-success-100\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/><span class=\"text-body\">Blockchair privacy scores of 45 and 55 suggest more dormant BTC may soon awaken.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Vintage <span>Bitcoin<\/span> Wallets Continue to Reactivate<\/h2>\n<p>Earlier this week, <span>Bitcoin.com<\/span> News <a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/dormant-2014-bitcoin-wallets-move-964-btc-worth-74-8m-in-48-hour-window\/\">reported<\/a> on five <span>bitcoin<\/span> wallets established in 2014 that transferred a combined 964.85 <span>BTC<\/span>, and since that report, another, albeit smaller, wave of dormant coins has continued to reappear from long-inactive addresses. Another 2014 wallet, created on Jan. 4 of that year, transferred 103.96 <span>BTC<\/span> on May 26 at block height 951160.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/5868c34bb4c6b6496330926217632d828353ca58b3ff94d9de8a671963928c8d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">transfer<\/a> was <a href=\"https:\/\/btcparser.com\/?a=1L6jhWvH7QA1vS7rrvxAXm6eaWYStgX7Q4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">detected<\/a> by btcparser.com, and the 103.96 <span>BTC<\/span>, valued at $7.8 million using current exchange rates, originated from a legacy P2PKH (Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash) wallet. The wallet transferred the funds to another legacy P2PKH address, where the holdings were later divided into two separate transactions, with at least 53.96 <span>BTC<\/span> ultimately sent to the <span>crypto<\/span> exchange <a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/coinbase-ceo-lists-7-areas-where-global-finance-still-needs-an-update\/\">Coinbase<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_817711\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-817711\" style=\"width:2386px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-817711\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Image source: The 2014 flow according to mempool.space data.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This gives the transaction a stronger likelihood of being a sale rather than a simple consolidation move. The owner of these coins would have secured a substantial return, and if the funds were truly sold, the gain would amount to roughly 9,044.11%. On Jan. 4, 2014, a single <span>BTC<\/span> traded for $823 per coin, whereas today, or at least as of 4:40 p.m. ET, <span>BTC<\/span> is changing hands at $75,256 per coin.<\/p>\n<p>Back in 2014, that cache of 103 <span>BTC<\/span> was worth just $85,559, only slightly higher than the price of a single <span>BTC<\/span> today. On Wednesday, two P2PKH wallets created in 2017 and 2016 transferred 46.85468400 <span>BTC<\/span> across two separate transactions, one carrying 24.99990000 <span>BTC<\/span> and the other moving 21.85478400 <span>BTC<\/span>. The first <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/1d95092614c04549563e47f77f50ab06ef6796a716bace2336ebe3e1abc4f92f\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">transfer<\/a>, containing 21.85 <span>BTC<\/span>, originated from a wallet created on March 10, 2017, approximately 9 years, 2 months, and 17 days ago.<\/p>\n<p>The stash eventually landed in a Bech32 (Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash) wallet that now holds 28.71 <span>BTC<\/span> valued at $2.16 million. The second <a href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/e4a814fb0cde9e6abe68c0155b87b84ba6f8c450585bafb29c46c377dbb85c86\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">transfer<\/a>, consisting of 24.99 <span>BTC<\/span>, also moved to a Bech32 wallet, which is currently worth $1.88 million. That particular wallet was created on Aug. 12, 2016, when <span>BTC<\/span> traded near $587 per coin.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of the March 2017 wallet, <span>BTC<\/span> exchanged hands at $1,201 per coin on the 10th of that month. Both owners are sitting on substantial realized or unrealized gains after holding the coins for so many years.<\/p>\n<p>This pair of transfers, however, does not indicate that the coins were moved into the bidding process for sale, as the transactions more likely reflect consolidation activity. Blockchair assigned the 2016 transfer a moderate privacy score of 55 after detecting a sweep into another address type, while the 2017 sender received the same score of 55.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_817712\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-817712\" style=\"width:2560px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-817712 size-full\" title=\"Another Set of Long-Silent Bitcoin Wallets Move Millions During BTC Decline\" src=\"https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-scaled.png\" alt=\"Screenshot of the blockchain explorer Blockchair. \" width=\"2560\" height=\"754\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-300x88.png 300w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-1024x302.png 1024w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-768x226.png 768w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-1536x453.png 1536w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-2048x603.png 2048w, https:\/\/static.news.bitcoin.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/screenshot-2026-05-27-at-5-33-35-pm_nwmk-scaled.png 2560w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-817712\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Image source: Blockchair\u2019s privacy meter on the 2014 transfer of more than 103 <span>BTC<\/span>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The 2014 sender that transferred 103.96 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.binance.com\/en\/price\/bitcoin\/\" class=\"lar_link lar_link_outgoing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">BTC<\/a>, some of which eventually reached Coinbase, received a score of 45 due to sweeping behavior and multiple occurrences of the same address appearing in the transaction inputs. While <a href=\"https:\/\/www.binance.com\/en\/price\/bitcoin\" class=\"lar_link lar_link_outgoing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">bitcoin<\/a> continues to hover 40% below its October 2025 all-time high above $126,000, long-dormant wallets appear increasingly willing to break years of silence and reposition old holdings.<\/p>\n<p>While some of these transfers hint at potential profit-taking, others carry the fingerprints of routine wallet management rather than immediate <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bitcoin.com\/get-started\/understanding-liquidation-on-perp-dex\/\" class=\"lar_link lar_link_outgoing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">liquidation<\/a>. Either way, the steady reawakening of vintage <a href=\"https:\/\/www.binance.com\/en\/price\/bitcoin\" class=\"lar_link lar_link_outgoing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">bitcoin<\/a> addresses continues to offer another reminder that a significant portion of the network\u2019s oldest wealth still remains active beneath the surface, waiting for the right moment to move.<\/p>\n<div class=\"not-prose my-3 lg:my-4\"><a aria-label=\"Read Now: Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" class=\"block overflow-hidden rounded-lg !bg-[#E8EDFA] p-[9px] no-underline focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-[#4169E1] focus-visible:ring-offset-2 flex flex-col md:hidden\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/bitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout\/\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"relative aspect-video w-full overflow-hidden rounded-[15px]\"><img alt=\"Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"fill\" class=\"object-cover\" style=\"position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) calc(100vw - 18px)\" srcset=\"\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=32&amp;q=75 32w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=48&amp;q=75 48w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=64&amp;q=75 64w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=128&amp;q=75 128w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=256&amp;q=75 256w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=384&amp;q=75 384w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=640&amp;q=75 640w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=828&amp;q=75 828w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=1080&amp;q=75 1080w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=1200&amp;q=75 1200w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75 1920w\" src=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-760x428.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75\"\/><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"absolute inset-x-0 bottom-0 m-0 p-3 text-xl font-bold capitalize leading-[1.17] tracking-[-0.4px] !text-white\">Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"flex flex-col gap-2.5 px-1 pt-2.5 pb-1\">\n<p class=\"m-0 line-clamp-2 text-xs leading-[1.3] !text-[#67656E]\">Bitcoin trended downward on Wednesday, dropping beneath the $75,000 threshold to trade at $74,570 at the time of writing. This\u2026<\/p>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"flex items-center justify-center rounded-pill bg-[#4169E1] text-sm font-medium text-white h-[38px] w-full\">Read Now<\/span><\/div>\n<p><\/a><a aria-label=\"Read Now: Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" class=\"block overflow-hidden rounded-lg !bg-[#E8EDFA] p-[9px] no-underline focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-[#4169E1] focus-visible:ring-offset-2 hidden md:flex md:flex-row md:gap-3 lg:hidden\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/bitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout\/\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"relative size-[150px] min-w-[150px] shrink-0 overflow-hidden rounded-[15px]\"><img alt=\"Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"fill\" class=\"object-cover\" style=\"position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent\" sizes=\"150px\" srcset=\"\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=32&amp;q=75 32w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=48&amp;q=75 48w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=64&amp;q=75 64w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=128&amp;q=75 128w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=256&amp;q=75 256w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=384&amp;q=75 384w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=640&amp;q=75 640w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=828&amp;q=75 828w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1080&amp;q=75 1080w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1200&amp;q=75 1200w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75 1920w\" src=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"absolute left-2 top-2\"><img alt=\"Bitcoin.com News\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"28\" height=\"28\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" class=\"size-7\" style=\"color:transparent\" srcset=\"\/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=32&amp;q=75 1x, \/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=64&amp;q=75 2x\" src=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=64&amp;q=75\"\/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"flex min-w-0 flex-1 flex-col justify-between gap-2\">\n<h3 class=\"m-0 line-clamp-3 text-xl font-bold capitalize leading-[1.17] tracking-[-0.4px] !text-[#1C1C1C]\">Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout<\/h3>\n<p class=\"m-0 line-clamp-2 text-sm leading-[1.3] !text-[#67656E]\">Bitcoin trended downward on Wednesday, dropping beneath the $75,000 threshold to trade at $74,570 at the time of writing. This\u2026<\/p>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"flex items-center justify-center rounded-pill bg-[#4169E1] text-sm font-medium text-white h-[38px] w-full\">Read Now<\/span><\/div>\n<p><\/a><a aria-label=\"Read Now: Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" class=\"block overflow-hidden rounded-lg !bg-[#E8EDFA] p-[9px] no-underline focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-[#4169E1] focus-visible:ring-offset-2 hidden lg:flex lg:flex-row lg:gap-4\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/bitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout\/\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"relative size-[150px] min-w-[150px] shrink-0 overflow-hidden rounded-[15px]\"><img alt=\"Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"fill\" class=\"object-cover\" style=\"position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent\" sizes=\"150px\" srcset=\"\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=32&amp;q=75 32w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=48&amp;q=75 48w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=64&amp;q=75 64w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=128&amp;q=75 128w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=256&amp;q=75 256w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=384&amp;q=75 384w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=640&amp;q=75 640w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=828&amp;q=75 828w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1080&amp;q=75 1080w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1200&amp;q=75 1200w, \/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75 1920w\" src=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/_next\/image\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.news.bitcoin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F05%2Fbitcoin-slips-to-74530-as-long-traders-face-106m-wipeout-150x150.png&amp;w=1920&amp;q=75\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"absolute left-2 top-2\"><img alt=\"Bitcoin.com News\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"28\" height=\"28\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" class=\"size-7\" style=\"color:transparent\" srcset=\"\/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=32&amp;q=75 1x, \/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=64&amp;q=75 2x\" src=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/_next\/image\/?url=%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fbitcoin_news_newlogo.svg&amp;w=64&amp;q=75\"\/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"flex min-w-0 flex-1 flex-col justify-center gap-2\">\n<p><h3 class=\"m-0 min-w-0 flex-1 line-clamp-2 text-2xl font-bold capitalize leading-[1.17] tracking-[-0.48px] !text-[#1C1C1C]\">Bitcoin Slips to $74,530 as Long Traders Face $106M Wipeout<\/h3>\n<p><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"flex items-center justify-center rounded-pill bg-[#4169E1] text-sm font-medium text-white h-12 w-[180px] shrink-0\">Read Now<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m-0 line-clamp-2 text-base leading-[1.3] !text-[#67656E]\">Bitcoin trended downward on Wednesday, dropping beneath the $75,000 threshold to trade at $74,570 at the time of writing. This\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/news.bitcoin.com\/another-set-of-long-silent-bitcoin-wallets-move-millions-during-btc-decline\/\">Source link <\/a><br \/>\n<br \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Originally posted on : Bitcoin News ) Key Takeaways Bitcoin wallets from 2014 and 2017 moved 150.81 BTC across multiple transfers on May 26. Coinbase received 53.96 BTC from a 2014 wallet, raising potential sale speculation. Blockchair privacy scores of 45 and 55 suggest more dormant BTC may soon awaken. Vintage Bitcoin Wallets Continue to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":73174,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73173"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73173\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowdfundjunction.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}